{"id":235,"date":"2020-05-26T14:56:05","date_gmt":"2020-05-26T14:56:05","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/suheylasahin.av.tr\/office-web\/?p=235"},"modified":"2020-05-26T14:56:05","modified_gmt":"2020-05-26T14:56:05","slug":"10-yillik-zaman-asimi","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/suheylasahin.av.tr\/office-web\/2020\/05\/26\/10-yillik-zaman-asimi\/","title":{"rendered":"10 Y\u0131ll\u0131k Zaman A\u015f\u0131m\u0131"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>T.C.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>YARGITAY<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>HUKUK GENEL KURULU<\/strong><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><strong> 2013\/8-375<\/strong><\/li>\n<li><strong> 2013\/520<\/strong><\/li>\n<li><strong> 17.4.2013<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<ul>\n<li><strong> KATILMA ALACA\u011eI ( Kat\u0131lma Alaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131n 10 Y\u0131ll\u0131k<br \/>\nZamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 S\u00fcresine Tabi Oldu\u011fu &#8211; Bo\u015fanma H\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fcn Kesinle\u015fme Tarihi de<br \/>\nG\u00f6zetildi\u011finde Islah Tarihinde 10 Y\u0131ll\u0131k Zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 S\u00fcresinin Ge\u00e7medi\u011finin<br \/>\nKabul\u00fc Gerekti\u011fi )<\/strong><\/li>\n<li><strong> ISLAH ZAMANA\u015eIMI ( Taraflar\u0131n 2002 Y\u0131l\u0131ndan \u00d6nce<br \/>\nEvlendi\u011fi\/Ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n 2002 Y\u0131l\u0131ndan Sonra Edinildi\u011fi &#8211; Bo\u015fanma H\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fcn<br \/>\nKesinle\u015fme Tarihi de G\u00f6zetildi\u011finde Islah Tarihinde Kat\u0131lma Alaca\u011f\u0131nda 10<br \/>\nY\u0131ll\u0131k Zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 S\u00fcresinin Ge\u00e7medi\u011finin Kabul Edilece\u011fi )<\/strong><\/li>\n<li><strong> ON YILLIK ZAMANA\u015eIMI ( Kat\u0131lma Alaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131n 1 Y\u0131ll\u0131k<br \/>\nDe\u011fil 10 Y\u0131ll\u0131k Zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 S\u00fcresine Tabi Oldu\u011fu )<\/strong><\/li>\n<li><strong> B\u0130R YILLIK ZAMANA\u015eIMI ( Kat\u0131lma Alaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131n 1 Y\u0131ll\u0131k<br \/>\nDe\u011fil 10 Y\u0131ll\u0131k Zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 S\u00fcresine Tabi Oldu\u011fu )<\/strong><\/li>\n<li><strong> ED\u0130N\u0130LM\u0130\u015e MALLARA KATILMA REJ\u0130M\u0130 ( Kat\u0131lma<br \/>\nAlaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131n 10 Y\u0131ll\u0131k Zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 S\u00fcresine Tabi Oldu\u011fu &#8211; Bo\u015fanma H\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fcn Kesinle\u015fme<br \/>\nTarihi de G\u00f6zetildi\u011finde Islah Tarihinde 10 Y\u0131ll\u0131k Zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 S\u00fcresinin<br \/>\nGe\u00e7medi\u011finin Kabul\u00fc Gerekti\u011fi )<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><strong>4721\/m.178, 231<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>6098\/m.146<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>818\/m.125<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>\u00d6ZET :<\/strong>Katk\u0131 pay\u0131 ve kat\u0131lma<br \/>\nalaca\u011f\u0131 davas\u0131nda; uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k; 4721 Say\u0131l\u0131 T\u00fcrk Medeni Kanunu&#8217;nun y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnden<br \/>\nsonra edinilen mallar konusunda, evlilik birli\u011finin bo\u015fanma ile sonu\u00e7lanmas\u0131<br \/>\nhalinde, e\u015fler aras\u0131nda kat\u0131lma alaca\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin davalarda zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131<br \/>\ns\u00fcresinin bir y\u0131l m\u0131, yoksa on y\u0131l m\u0131 oldu\u011fu; var\u0131lacak sonuca g\u00f6re \u0131slah<br \/>\nedilen k\u0131sm\u0131n zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131na u\u011fray\u0131p u\u011framad\u0131\u011f\u0131 noktas\u0131nda toplanmaktad\u0131r.<br \/>\nTaraflar\u0131n 1990 y\u0131l\u0131nda evlendikleri, uyu\u015fmazl\u0131\u011f\u0131n 01.01. 2002 tarihinden sonra<br \/>\nedinilen ta\u015f\u0131nmaz y\u00f6n\u00fcnden kat\u0131lma alaca\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin bulundu\u011fu, 12.12.2005<br \/>\ntarihinde a\u00e7\u0131lan bo\u015fanma davas\u0131n\u0131n kabulle sonu\u00e7land\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve bo\u015fanma h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fcn<br \/>\n13.10.2008 tarihinde kesinle\u015fmi\u015f bulundu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r. Buna g\u00f6re, \u0131slah<br \/>\ntarihi olan 11.10.2011 tarihi itibariyle Kanunda \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen on y\u0131ll\u0131k zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131<br \/>\ns\u00fcresinin ge\u00e7medi\u011fi kabul edilmelidir.<\/p>\n<p>Davac\u0131-daval\u0131n\u0131n kat\u0131lma alaca\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin \u0131slah\u0131n TMK m. <a href=\"http:\/\/kazanci.com.tr\/gunluk\/tc4721.htm#178\">178<\/a> uyar\u0131nca bir ( 1 )<br \/>\ny\u0131ll\u0131k zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 s\u00fcresine tabi oldu\u011fu y\u00f6n\u00fcndeki bozma karar\u0131na, yerel<br \/>\nmahkemece &#8220;davan\u0131n on ( 10 ) y\u0131ll\u0131k dava zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 s\u00fcresine tabi<br \/>\noldu\u011fu&#8221; \u015feklindeki gerek\u00e7e ile direnmesi, yerinde olup onanmal\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p><strong>DAVA :<\/strong>Taraflar aras\u0131ndaki<br \/>\n&#8220;katk\u0131 pay\u0131 ve kat\u0131lma alaca\u011f\u0131&#8221; davas\u0131ndan dolay\u0131 yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lama<br \/>\nsonunda; Kad\u0131k\u00f6y 1. Aile Mahkemesince davan\u0131n kabul\u00fcne dair verilen 23.11.2011<br \/>\ng\u00fcn ve 2007\/176 E.-2011\/1000 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131n incelenmesi taraf vekilleri<br \/>\ntaraf\u0131ndan istenilmesi \u00fczerine, Yarg\u0131tay 8.Hukuk Dairesinin 08.05.2012 g\u00fcn ve<br \/>\n2012\/2056 E., 2012\/3981 K. say\u0131l\u0131 ilam\u0131 ile;<\/p>\n<p>( &#8230; Davac\u0131-birle\u015fen dosyada daval\u0131 E. Ay\u015fe G. vekili, evlilik i\u00e7inde<br \/>\nal\u0131nan ve daval\u0131 S. ad\u0131na tescil edilen Gelibolu ve Zekeriyak\u00f6y&#8217;de bulunan<br \/>\nta\u015f\u0131nmazlarla ilgili katk\u0131 pay\u0131 ve kat\u0131lma alaca\u011f\u0131 iste\u011finde bulunmu\u015f, ayr\u0131ca<br \/>\nvekil edenine ait antika y\u00fcz\u00fckle ilgili de talepleri oldu\u011fu bildirilmi\u015f,<br \/>\nbirle\u015fen dosyada vekil edeni aleyhine a\u00e7\u0131lan davan\u0131n reddine karar verilmesini<br \/>\nve aksi halde belirlenecek miktarlar\u0131n kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131kl\u0131 takas ve mahsup edilmesini<br \/>\nistemi\u015f, 11.10.2011 tarihli harc\u0131n\u0131 da yat\u0131rd\u0131\u011f\u0131 dilek\u00e7esi ile taleplerini<br \/>\n111.300 TL katk\u0131 pay\u0131, 148.700 TL kat\u0131lma alaca\u011f\u0131 olarak \u0131slah etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p>Daval\u0131 S. Mert \u015e. vekili, Zekeriyak\u00f6y&#8217;deki ta\u015f\u0131nmazda davac\u0131n\u0131n katk\u0131s\u0131<br \/>\nolmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, Gelibolu&#8217;daki ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n annesi taraf\u0131ndan bedelsiz verildi\u011fini,<br \/>\ny\u00fcz\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn varl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ve vekil edeni taraf\u0131ndan al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ispat edilmesi<br \/>\ngerekti\u011fini a\u00e7\u0131klayarak davac\u0131n\u0131n davas\u0131n\u0131n reddine karar verilmesini savunmu\u015f,<br \/>\nbirle\u015fen dava dosyas\u0131nda ise, evlilik i\u00e7inde al\u0131nan ve E. ad\u0131na tescil edilen<br \/>\niki adet ara\u00e7la ilgili katk\u0131 pay\u0131 ve kat\u0131lma alaca\u011f\u0131 iste\u011finde bulunarak<br \/>\nbirle\u015fen dosyan\u0131n daval\u0131s\u0131 E.&#8217;dan tahsilini istemi\u015ftir. Islah dilek\u00e7esine kar\u015f\u0131<br \/>\ncevab\u0131nda ise kat\u0131lma alaca\u011f\u0131 ile ilgili talebin zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131na u\u011frad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131<br \/>\na\u00e7\u0131klayarak reddi gerekti\u011fini savunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n<p>Mahkemece, davac\u0131 E. Ay\u015fe G. vekili taraf\u0131ndan a\u00e7\u0131lan katk\u0131 pay\u0131 alaca\u011f\u0131<br \/>\ndavas\u0131n\u0131n kabul\u00fc ile 111.300 TL katk\u0131 pay\u0131 alaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131n daval\u0131-kar\u015f\u0131 davac\u0131 S.<br \/>\nMert \u015e.&#8217;den tahsiline, h\u00fck\u00fcm alt\u0131na al\u0131nan katk\u0131 pay\u0131 alaca\u011f\u0131ndan 100.000 TL&#8217;ye<br \/>\ndava tarihi, 1.300 TL&#8217;ye ise \u0131slah tarihinden itibaren yasal faiz<br \/>\ny\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclmesine, davac\u0131 E. Ay\u015fe G. taraf\u0131ndan a\u00e7\u0131lan denkle\u015ftirme kat\u0131l\u0131m alaca\u011f\u0131<br \/>\nisteminin k\u0131smen kabul\u00fc k\u0131smen reddi ile 148.700 TL kat\u0131l\u0131m alaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131n karar<br \/>\ntarihinden itibaren yasal faizi ile birlikte daval\u0131 S. Mert \u015e.&#8217;den tahsiline,<br \/>\nfazlaya dair istemin reddine, davac\u0131 E. Ay\u015fe G.&#8217;l\u0131n y\u00fcz\u00fck ile ilgili talebinin<br \/>\nvazge\u00e7me nedeni ile reddine, mahkememizin bu dosyas\u0131 ile birle\u015ftirilen dava<br \/>\ndosyas\u0131nda davac\u0131 S. Mert \u015e. lehine 10.000 TL kat\u0131l\u0131m alaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131n karar<br \/>\ntarihinden itibaren yasal faizi ile birlikte davac\u0131dan al\u0131n\u0131p daval\u0131-kar\u015f\u0131<br \/>\ndavac\u0131ya \u00f6denmesine, daval\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131 davac\u0131n\u0131n katk\u0131 pay\u0131 davas\u0131n\u0131n k\u0131smen kabul\u00fc<br \/>\nk\u0131smen reddi ile 7.200 TL katk\u0131 pay\u0131 alaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131n davan\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 12.10.2009<br \/>\ntarihinden itibaren yasal faizi ile birlikte E.&#8217;dan tahsiline, fazlaya dair<br \/>\nistemin reddine, taraflar\u0131n h\u00fck\u00fcm alt\u0131na al\u0131nan alacaklar\u0131 ile do\u011facak yasal<br \/>\nfaizlerin karar kesinle\u015fti\u011finde kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131kl\u0131 olarak takas ve mahsubuna karar<br \/>\nverilmesi \u00fczerine h\u00fck\u00fcm daval\u0131-birle\u015fen dosyan\u0131n davac\u0131s\u0131 S. Mert \u015e. vekili ile<br \/>\nkat\u0131lma yolu ile davac\u0131 birle\u015fen dosyan\u0131n, daval\u0131s\u0131 E. Ay\u015fe G. vekili<br \/>\ntaraf\u0131ndan temyiz edilmi\u015ftir. Mahkeme, daval\u0131-kar\u015f\u0131 davac\u0131 vekilinin h\u00fckm\u00fcn<br \/>\na\u00e7\u0131klanmas\u0131na ili\u015fkin iste\u011fini de h\u00fck\u00fcmde a\u00e7\u0131klanmas\u0131 gereken bir husus veya<br \/>\nmaddi hata olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7esi ile reddetmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p>Taraflar 20.9.1990 tarihinde evlenmi\u015f 12.12.2005 tarihinde a\u00e7\u0131lan bo\u015fanma<br \/>\ndavas\u0131n\u0131n kabul\u00fcne ili\u015fkin h\u00fckm\u00fcn 13.10.2008 tarihinde kesinle\u015fmesiyle<br \/>\nbo\u015fanm\u0131\u015flard\u0131r. E\u015fler aras\u0131nda ba\u015fka mal rejimi se\u00e7ilmedi\u011finden 01.01.2002<br \/>\ntarihine kadar mal ayr\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 ( 743 say\u0131l\u0131 TKM.nin 170. m. ), bu tarihten mal<br \/>\nrejiminin sona erdi\u011fi bo\u015fanma davas\u0131n\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 tarihe kadar ( 4721 say\u0131l\u0131<br \/>\nTMK.nun<a href=\"http:\/\/kazanci.com.tr\/gunluk\/tc4721.htm#225\">225<\/a>\/2. m. ) yasal mal<br \/>\nrejimi olan edinilmi\u015f mallara kat\u0131lma rejimi ge\u00e7erlidir ( 4721 say\u0131l\u0131 TMK.nun<a href=\"http:\/\/kazanci.com.tr\/gunluk\/tc4721.htm#202\">202<\/a>.m ).<\/p>\n<p>Dava konusu mal varl\u0131\u011f\u0131 de\u011ferlerinden Sar\u0131yer Zekeriyak\u00f6y&#8217;deki 1431 parselde<br \/>\n7 nolu dubleks mesken kooperatif ad\u0131na tapuda kay\u0131tl\u0131 olup kooperatife S. Mert<br \/>\n\u015e. 22.5.2000 tarihinde ortak olarak girmi\u015f ve kooperatif ortakl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 26.7.2005<br \/>\ntarihinde A. G. G.&#8217;a devretmi\u015ftir. Di\u011fer dava konusu Gelibolu G\u00fcneyli K\u00f6y\u00fcndeki<br \/>\n2901 parsel ise erke\u011fin annesi A. \u015e. ad\u0131na tapuda kay\u0131tl\u0131 iken 28.8.1996<br \/>\ntarihinde tapuda sat\u0131\u015f yolu ile S. Mert \u015e.&#8217;e devredilmi\u015ftir. Birle\u015fen dosyada<br \/>\ndava konusu edilen 34 &#8230; 3390 plakal\u0131 ara\u00e7 29.9.1999, 34 &#8230; 2248 plakal\u0131 ara\u00e7<br \/>\nise 26.7.2004 tarihinde E. Ay\u015fe G. ad\u0131na trafikte tescil edilmi\u015ftir. Dava<br \/>\nkonusu mal varl\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131n edinme tarihleri itibariyle taraflar\u0131n isteklerinin<br \/>\nkar\u015f\u0131l\u0131kl\u0131 olarak katk\u0131 pay\u0131 ve kat\u0131lma alaca\u011f\u0131 niteli\u011finde oldu\u011fu<br \/>\nanla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p>Davac\u0131 E. vekili, vekil edeni aleyhine a\u00e7\u0131lan bo\u015fanma davas\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131<br \/>\nharc\u0131n\u0131 da yat\u0131rd\u0131\u011f\u0131 12.12.2005 tarihli kar\u015f\u0131 davas\u0131nda &#8220;edinilmi\u015f mallara<br \/>\nkat\u0131lma rejiminin tasfiyesi ile vekil edenimizin kendi hissesi olan 100.000<br \/>\nTL&#8217;nin vekil edeninin banka hesab\u0131na ge\u00e7irilmesini&#8221; istemi\u015f, bu istek<br \/>\nbo\u015fanma davas\u0131ndan tefrik edilerek ayr\u0131 esasa kaydedilmi\u015ftir. Bilahare<br \/>\nmahkemenin iste\u011fi \u00fczerine 11.10.2011 tarihli dilek\u00e7esi ile iste\u011fini a\u00e7\u0131klam\u0131\u015f<br \/>\nve ayn\u0131 zamanda \u0131slah iste\u011finde de bulunmu\u015f ve \u0131slah etti\u011fi miktara ili\u015fkin<br \/>\nharc\u0131 da tamamlam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Bu dilek\u00e7esinde a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a davan\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131lmas\u0131 s\u0131ras\u0131ndaki<br \/>\nisteklerini katk\u0131 pay\u0131 alaca\u011f\u0131na \u00f6zg\u00fclediklerini ve bu 100.000 TL katk\u0131 pay\u0131<br \/>\nalacaklar\u0131n\u0131n 111.300 TL&#8217;ye y\u00fckselttiklerini, bunun d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda 158.700 TL kat\u0131lma<br \/>\nalaca\u011f\u0131 talepleri oldu\u011funu, aleyhlerine a\u00e7\u0131lan dava sebebiyle varsa 10.000 TL<br \/>\nkat\u0131lma alaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131n da takas edilmesini istediklerini a\u00e7\u0131klam\u0131\u015f ve \u0131slah<br \/>\niste\u011finde bulunmu\u015ftur. Bu dilek\u00e7eye kar\u015f\u0131 19.10.2011 tarihli dilek\u00e7esi ile S.<br \/>\nvekili, \u0131slah edilen kat\u0131lma alaca\u011f\u0131 ile ilgili 1 y\u0131ll\u0131k zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131n\u0131n<br \/>\nge\u00e7ti\u011fini a\u00e7\u0131klayarak zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 definde bulunmu\u015ftur. \u00d6ncelikle davac\u0131n\u0131n ( E.<br \/>\nAy\u015fe G. ) 12.12.2005 tarihinde a\u00e7t\u0131\u011f\u0131 davas\u0131nda davan\u0131n niteli\u011fi tam<br \/>\nanla\u015f\u0131lamamakta ise de 11.10.2011 tarihli dilek\u00e7esinde a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a bu miktar\u0131 (<br \/>\n100.000 TL&#8217;yi ) katk\u0131 pay\u0131 alaca\u011f\u0131na \u00f6zg\u00fclediklerini bildirdi\u011fine g\u00f6re<br \/>\nmahkemenin taleple ba\u011fl\u0131 olmas\u0131 kural\u0131 da g\u00f6zetilerek davac\u0131n\u0131n iste\u011finin mal<br \/>\nrejiminin tasfiyesinden kaynaklanan alacak iste\u011fi olmakla birlikte 100.000 TL<br \/>\nmiktar\u0131ndaki harc\u0131 yat\u0131r\u0131lan talebinin tamam\u0131n\u0131n katk\u0131 pay\u0131 alaca\u011f\u0131 olarak<br \/>\nkabul edilmesi gerekir. Bunun d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda davac\u0131n\u0131n \u0131slah dilek\u00e7esinde<br \/>\nayr\u0131nt\u0131lar\u0131n\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131klad\u0131\u011f\u0131 kat\u0131lma alaca\u011f\u0131 iste\u011fi de bulunmaktad\u0131r. Di\u011fer yandan<br \/>\nbirle\u015fen dosyadaki S.&#8217;\u0131n talebinin 34 &#8230; 3390 plakal\u0131 ara\u00e7 bak\u0131m\u0131ndan katk\u0131<br \/>\npay\u0131, 34 &#8230; 2248 plakal\u0131 ara\u00e7 y\u00f6n\u00fcnden ise kat\u0131lma alaca\u011f\u0131 oldu\u011fu hususunda<br \/>\nteredd\u00fct yoktur.<\/p>\n<p>Bu belirlemeden sonra, dosya kapsam\u0131, toplanan deliller ve al\u0131nan bilirki\u015fi<br \/>\nraporlar\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda ortak hesaptan \u00e7ekilen para ile al\u0131nmas\u0131 halinde de yar\u0131<br \/>\nyar\u0131ya taraflara ait olmas\u0131 gereken 34 &#8230; 2248 plakal\u0131 arac\u0131n al\u0131m tarihi<br \/>\nitibariyle aksi ispatlanamad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan edinilmi\u015f mal olarak kabul edilerek,<br \/>\nkat\u0131lma alaca\u011f\u0131 hesaplanmas\u0131nda, 34 &#8230; 3390 plakal\u0131 ara\u00e7la ilgili olarak da<br \/>\ndava tarihindeki de\u011fer ve taraflar\u0131n gelirleri, ki\u015fisel tasarruflar\u0131 ve erke\u011fin<br \/>\nTKM.nin 152. maddesinde yaz\u0131l\u0131 evi ge\u00e7indirme y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc g\u00f6z\u00f6n\u00fcnde<br \/>\nbulundurularak belirlenen katk\u0131 pay\u0131 oran\u0131 ile \u00e7arp\u0131larak bulunan katk\u0131 pay\u0131<br \/>\nalaca\u011f\u0131 miktar\u0131nda usul ve yasaya ayk\u0131r\u0131 bir y\u00f6n bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na, al\u0131nan<br \/>\nbilirki\u015fi raporlar\u0131 ve yap\u0131lan hesaplamalar h\u00fck\u00fcm kurmaya yeterli g\u00f6r\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne<br \/>\ng\u00f6re bu t\u00fcr davalarda uygulanmas\u0131 gereken hakkaniyet ve fedakarl\u0131\u011f\u0131n<br \/>\ndenkle\u015ftirilmesi ilkeleri kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda h\u00fckm\u00fc kat\u0131lma yoluyla temyiz eden<br \/>\ndavac\u0131-birle\u015fen dosyada daval\u0131 E. vekilinin ara\u00e7larla ilgili temyiz<br \/>\nitirazlar\u0131n\u0131n tamam\u0131 yerinde g\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p>Dosya muhtevas\u0131na, dava evrak\u0131 ile yarg\u0131lama tutanaklar\u0131 m\u00fcnderecat\u0131na,<br \/>\nmevcut deliller mahkemece takdir edilerek karar verildi\u011fine, dosya aras\u0131nda<br \/>\nbulunan banka dekontlar\u0131 ve hesap ekstreleri ile havale edilen miktarlar<br \/>\ng\u00f6zetilerek Gelibolu&#8217;daki ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n bedelsiz de\u011fil erke\u011fin annesi taraf\u0131ndan<br \/>\nsat\u0131\u015fla devredildi\u011fi kabul edildi\u011fine, \u00e7al\u0131\u015farak gelir elde etti\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lan<br \/>\nkad\u0131n\u0131n gelirini ba\u015fka yerde kulland\u0131\u011f\u0131 ispat edilemedi\u011finden al\u0131mlarda katk\u0131s\u0131<br \/>\noldu\u011funun kabul\u00fc gerekti\u011fine, yap\u0131lan katk\u0131 pay\u0131 hesaplanmas\u0131nda taraf<br \/>\ngelirleri, ki\u015fisel harcamalar\u0131 ve TKM.nin 152. Maddesindeki erke\u011fin evi<br \/>\nge\u00e7indirme y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc dikkate al\u0131narak belirlenen katk\u0131 pay\u0131 oran\u0131 ile dava<br \/>\ntarihindeki ta\u015f\u0131nmaz de\u011ferleri \u00e7arp\u0131larak katk\u0131 pay\u0131 alaca\u011f\u0131 bulundu\u011funa, bu<br \/>\nhesaplamada Zekeriyak\u00f6y&#8217;deki ta\u015f\u0131nmaz bak\u0131m\u0131ndan 1.1.2002 tarihine kadar<br \/>\nyap\u0131lan \u00f6demeler de g\u00f6zetildi\u011fine, 111.300 TL bulunan katk\u0131 pay\u0131 alaca\u011f\u0131<br \/>\nbak\u0131m\u0131ndan dava tarihi ve \u0131slah tarihindeki de\u011ferlere ayr\u0131 ayr\u0131 faiz<br \/>\ny\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne, faiz y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclmeyen 10.000 TL miktar i\u00e7in mahsuptan s\u00f6z edilerek<br \/>\n\u0131slah dilek\u00e7esinde faiz istenmedi\u011fine, feragat sebebiyle reddine karar verilen<br \/>\nantika y\u00fcz\u00fckle ilgili harc\u0131 yat\u0131r\u0131larak art\u0131r\u0131lan bir de\u011fer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan harc\u0131<br \/>\nyatmayan de\u011ferle ilgili vekalet \u00fccreti takdir edilemeyece\u011fine, dava<br \/>\ndilek\u00e7esinin a\u00e7\u0131klanmas\u0131 niteli\u011findeki 11.10.2011 tarihli dilek\u00e7ede ayr\u0131ca<br \/>\nyarg\u0131lama giderleri ve vekalet \u00fccretinden bahsedilmemi\u015f olmas\u0131n\u0131n, dava<br \/>\ndilek\u00e7esinde a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a yaz\u0131larak istenen bu taleplerle ilgili davac\u0131n\u0131n hakk\u0131n\u0131<br \/>\nortadan kald\u0131rmayaca\u011f\u0131na, ta\u015f\u0131nmazlar\u0131 veya hakk\u0131n\u0131 al\u0131m tarihlerinde kocas\u0131na<br \/>\nba\u011f\u0131\u015flad\u0131\u011f\u0131na dair kad\u0131n\u0131n ba\u011f\u0131\u015flama iradesini i\u00e7eren herhangi bir delil veya<br \/>\nbeyan da dosyaya sunulmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na, talep dikkate al\u0131narak kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131kl\u0131 h\u00fckmedilen<br \/>\nalacaklar ve faizleri bak\u0131m\u0131ndan takas ve mahsuba karar verildi\u011fine g\u00f6re<br \/>\ndaval\u0131-birle\u015fen dosyadaki davac\u0131 S. vekilinin a\u015fa\u011f\u0131da yaz\u0131l\u0131 kat\u0131lma alaca\u011f\u0131<br \/>\nd\u0131\u015f\u0131ndaki di\u011fer temyiz itirazlar\u0131 da yerinde de\u011fildir.<\/p>\n<p>Daval\u0131-birle\u015fen dosyan\u0131n davac\u0131s\u0131 S. vekilinin kat\u0131lma alaca\u011f\u0131 ile ilgili<br \/>\ntemyiz itirazlar\u0131na gelince; mahkemece yap\u0131lan de\u011ferlendirmede a\u00e7\u0131lan davan\u0131n<br \/>\nesas itibariyle belirsiz davalar oldu\u011fu, TMK.nun<a href=\"http:\/\/kazanci.com.tr\/gunluk\/tc4721.htm#178\">178<\/a>. maddesinde yaz\u0131l\u0131<br \/>\nzamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 s\u00fcresinin bo\u015fanmadan kaynaklanan maddi manevi tazminat ve yoksulluk<br \/>\nnafakas\u0131 ile ilgili oldu\u011fu, aleyhe yorumlanamayaca\u011f\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131klanarak zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131<br \/>\ndefi reddedilmi\u015f ve yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde h\u00fck\u00fcm kurulmu\u015ftur. Davac\u0131n\u0131n kat\u0131lma alaca\u011f\u0131<br \/>\niste\u011fini \u0131slah dilek\u00e7esinde 158.700 TL olarak bildirdi\u011fi ve harc\u0131n\u0131 da \u0131slah<br \/>\nile birlikte yat\u0131rd\u0131\u011f\u0131, dava dilek\u00e7esindeki yaz\u0131l\u0131 miktar i\u00e7inde kat\u0131lma<br \/>\nalaca\u011f\u0131 olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, dava dilek\u00e7esindeki 100.000 TL miktar\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a katk\u0131 pay\u0131<br \/>\nalaca\u011f\u0131na \u00f6zg\u00fclendi\u011fi, dava 1 y\u0131ll\u0131k s\u00fcrede a\u00e7\u0131lmakla birlikte dava<br \/>\ndilek\u00e7esinde kat\u0131lma alaca\u011f\u0131 olarak talep edilen bir miktar\u0131n olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n<br \/>\ndavac\u0131 E. vekili taraf\u0131ndan a\u00e7\u0131kland\u0131\u011f\u0131, taraflar\u0131n bo\u015fanmalar\u0131na ili\u015fkin<br \/>\nmahkeme karar\u0131n\u0131n kesinle\u015fti\u011fi 13.10.2008 tarihinden \u0131slah dilek\u00e7esinin<br \/>\nverildi\u011fi 11.10.2011 tarihleri aras\u0131nda kat\u0131lma alaca\u011f\u0131 bak\u0131m\u0131ndan 1 y\u0131ll\u0131k<br \/>\nzamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 s\u00fcresinin de ge\u00e7ti\u011fi ve daval\u0131n\u0131n \u0131slah dilek\u00e7esine kar\u015f\u0131 s\u00fcresinde<br \/>\nzamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 definde bulundu\u011fu ihtilafs\u0131zd\u0131r. Uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k, davac\u0131n\u0131n kat\u0131lma alaca\u011f\u0131<br \/>\ntalebi bak\u0131m\u0131ndan zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 s\u00fcresinin 1 y\u0131l olarak uygulan\u0131p uygulanamayaca\u011f\u0131<br \/>\nhususunda toplanmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p>743 say\u0131l\u0131 TKM.nin y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckte bulundu\u011fu d\u00f6nemde mal ayr\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 rejimi s\u00f6z<br \/>\nkonusu idi. Mal ayr\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 rejimi i\u00e7in 743 say\u0131l\u0131 TKM. de mal rejimi konusunda<br \/>\nherhangi bir zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 s\u00fcresi \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015fti. Ancak, 743 say\u0131l\u0131 TKM.nin<br \/>\nBor\u00e7lar\u0131n Umumi Kaideleri ba\u015fl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131yan 5. ( 4721 say\u0131l\u0131 TMK. m.<a href=\"http:\/\/kazanci.com.tr\/gunluk\/tc4721.htm#5\">5<\/a> ) maddesinde,<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Akitlerin in&#8217;ikad\u0131na ve h\u00fck\u00fcmlerine ve s\u00fckutu sebeplerine taalluk<br \/>\nedip bor\u00e7lar k\u0131sm\u0131nda beyan olunan umumi kaideler, medeni hukukun di\u011fer<br \/>\nk\u0131s\u0131mlar\u0131nda dahi caridir&#8221; amir h\u00fckm\u00fcne yer verilmi\u015ftir. Bu durum<br \/>\nkar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda an\u0131lan madde gere\u011fince BK.nun zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131na ili\u015fkin uygun d\u00fc\u015fen<br \/>\nh\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fcn mal rejimleri konusunda da uygulanabilece\u011fi kabul edilmektedir. Bu<br \/>\ndurum kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda, TKM.nin 5. maddesinin yollamas\u0131yla mal ayr\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 rejimi d\u00f6nemi<br \/>\nbak\u0131m\u0131ndan BK.nun 125. maddesinde \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen 10 y\u0131ll\u0131k zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 s\u00fcresi uygun<br \/>\nd\u00fc\u015fmektedir. BK.nun 125. maddesinde; &#8220;Bu kanunda ba\u015fka suretle h\u00fck\u00fcm<br \/>\nmevcut olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 taktirde her dava 10 senelik m\u00fcrur zamana tabidir&#8221;,<br \/>\ndenilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p>Madde metninde s\u00f6z\u00fc edilen &#8220;her dava&#8221; s\u00f6zc\u00fc\u011f\u00fc her alacak olarak<br \/>\nde\u011ferlendirilmektedir. Ayn\u0131 Kanunun 132\/1-3 nolu bendinde ise, &#8220;Nikah<br \/>\ndevam etti\u011fi m\u00fcddet\u00e7e kar\u0131 kocadan birinin di\u011ferinin zimmetinde olan alacaklar\u0131<br \/>\nhakk\u0131nda zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 i\u015flemez&#8221; h\u00fckm\u00fcne yer verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p>4721 say\u0131l\u0131 TMK.nunda ise, zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131na ili\u015fkin h\u00fck\u00fcm yer almaktad\u0131r.<br \/>\nAn\u0131lan Kanunun <a href=\"http:\/\/kazanci.com.tr\/gunluk\/tc4721.htm#178\">178<\/a>. maddesinde;<br \/>\n&#8220;Evlili\u011fin bo\u015fanma sebebiyle sona ermesinden do\u011fan dava haklar\u0131, bo\u015fanma<br \/>\nh\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fcn kesinle\u015fmesinin \u00fczerinden bir y\u0131l ge\u00e7mekle zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131na u\u011frar&#8221;<br \/>\ndenilmi\u015ftir. Maddenin birinci b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcnden de a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a anla\u015f\u0131laca\u011f\u0131 \u00fczere<br \/>\n&#8220;evlili\u011fin bo\u015fanma sebebiyle sona ermesinden do\u011fan dava haklar\u0131&#8230;&#8221;<br \/>\ndenilmektedir. Bu h\u00fckm\u00fcn sadece bo\u015fanman\u0131n feri niteli\u011finde bulunan nafaka,<br \/>\nmaddi ve manevi tazminat ile benzeri-.haklar\u0131 kapsad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 s\u00f6ylemek g\u00fc\u00e7t\u00fcr.<br \/>\nEvlili\u011fin bo\u015fanma sebebiyle sona ermesinden do\u011fan -dava haklar\u0131 ibaresinin ayn\u0131<br \/>\nzamanda edinilmi\u015f mallara kat\u0131lma rejiminden do\u011fan kat\u0131lma alaca\u011f\u0131 ve de\u011fer<br \/>\nart\u0131\u015f pay\u0131n\u0131 da kapsad\u0131\u011f\u0131 d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fclmektedir. Halihaz\u0131rda Daire uygulamas\u0131 bu<br \/>\ny\u00f6ndedir. 743 say\u0131l\u0131 TKM.nun 170. maddesi uyar\u0131nca mal ayr\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 rejiminin<br \/>\nge\u00e7erli oldu\u011fu d\u00f6nemde katk\u0131 pay\u0131 alaca\u011f\u0131na y\u00f6nelik t\u00fcm davalar s\u00f6zle\u015fme olsun<br \/>\nveya olmas\u0131n 743 say\u0131l\u0131 TKM.nin( 4721 say\u0131l\u0131 TMK.nun ) 5. maddesinin<br \/>\nyollamas\u0131yla BK.nun 125. maddesi gere\u011fince 10 y\u0131ll\u0131k zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131na tabidir.<br \/>\nTMK.nun<a href=\"http:\/\/kazanci.com.tr\/gunluk\/tc4721.htm#225\">225<\/a>\/1. maddesi uyar\u0131nca<br \/>\nmal rejimi, e\u015flerden birinin \u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fc veya ba\u015fka bir mal rejiminin kabul\u00fcyle sona<br \/>\nermi\u015f ( ki ba\u015fka bir mal rejiminin kabul\u00fc halinde s\u00f6zle\u015fme s\u00f6z konusu olur ) ya<br \/>\nda ayn\u0131 maddenin ikinci f\u0131kras\u0131 gere\u011fince mahkemece evlili\u011fin iptaline karar<br \/>\nverilmesi hallerinde de 4721 say\u0131l\u0131 TMK.nun<a href=\"http:\/\/kazanci.com.tr\/gunluk\/tc4721.htm#5\">5<\/a>. maddesinin<br \/>\nyollamas\u0131yla BK.nun 125. maddesinde \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen 10 y\u0131ll\u0131k zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 uygulanmaktad\u0131r.<br \/>\n01.01.2002 tarihinden sonra e\u015fler aras\u0131nda mal rejimi konusunda yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f bir<br \/>\ns\u00f6zle\u015fme s\u00f6z konusu ise, yine 10 y\u0131ll\u0131k zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 uygulanacakt\u0131r. TMK.nun<a href=\"http:\/\/kazanci.com.tr\/gunluk\/tc4721.htm#225\">225<\/a>\/2. f\u0131kras\u0131nda;<br \/>\n&#8220;Mahkemece evlili\u011fin ( &#8230; ) bo\u015fanma sebebiyle sona ermesi&#8230;&#8221;<br \/>\nhalinde kat\u0131lma alaca\u011f\u0131 bak\u0131m\u0131ndan TMK.nun<a href=\"http:\/\/kazanci.com.tr\/gunluk\/tc4721.htm#178\">178<\/a>. maddesinde yer alan<br \/>\nbir y\u0131ll\u0131k zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131n\u0131n uygulanaca\u011f\u0131 Dairece kabul edilmektedir. Daha \u00f6nce mal<br \/>\nrejimine ili\u015fkin davalar\u0131n g\u00f6r\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc Y\u00fcksek Yarg\u0131tay 2. Hukuk Dairesinde de;<br \/>\n4721 say\u0131l\u0131 TMK.nun<a href=\"http:\/\/kazanci.com.tr\/gunluk\/tc4721.htm#231\">231<\/a>. maddesine dayal\u0131<br \/>\nkat\u0131lma alaca\u011f\u0131 konusundaki kararlar oy\u00e7oklu\u011fuyla verilmi\u015ftir. \u00c7o\u011funluk;<br \/>\nTMK.nun<a href=\"http:\/\/kazanci.com.tr\/gunluk\/tc4721.htm#5\">5<\/a>. maddesi yollamas\u0131yla<br \/>\nbu mal rejiminde BK.nun 125. maddesinde yer alan 10 y\u0131ll\u0131k, az\u0131nl\u0131k ise;<br \/>\nTMK.nun<a href=\"http:\/\/kazanci.com.tr\/gunluk\/tc4721.htm#178\">178<\/a>. maddesindeki bir<br \/>\ny\u0131ll\u0131k zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 s\u00fcresinin uygulanmas\u0131n\u0131 benimsemi\u015ftir ( 2.H.D. 05.02.2007 T.<br \/>\nve 9383\/1228 E\/K ).<\/p>\n<p>Mal rejimleri konusunda on y\u0131ll\u0131k zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 s\u00fcresinin uygulanmas\u0131n\u0131n<br \/>\ngerekti\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fc savunanlar; TMK.nun<a href=\"http:\/\/kazanci.com.tr\/gunluk\/tc4721.htm#178\">178<\/a>. maddesininTMK.nun<br \/>\nbo\u015fanma k\u0131sm\u0131nda yer ald\u0131\u011f\u0131, bu nedenle sadece bo\u015fanman\u0131n eki niteli\u011finde<br \/>\nbulunan davalar hakk\u0131nda uygulanmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi, mal rejimleri konusunda<br \/>\nuygulanmas\u0131n\u0131n m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, maddenin kanunda yer al\u0131\u015f bi\u00e7iminin de buna<br \/>\nengel oldu\u011fu gerek\u00e7esine dayanmaktad\u0131rlar. Kanun sistemati\u011fine g\u00f6re ger\u00e7ekten<br \/>\nTMK.nun<a href=\"http:\/\/kazanci.com.tr\/gunluk\/tc4721.htm#178\">178<\/a>. maddesi bo\u015fanma<br \/>\nk\u0131sm\u0131nda yer almaktad\u0131r. Ne var ki, TMK.nun<a href=\"http:\/\/kazanci.com.tr\/gunluk\/tc4721.htm#158\">158<\/a> ve <a href=\"http:\/\/kazanci.com.tr\/gunluk\/tc4721.htm#179\">179<\/a>. maddeleri de ayn\u0131<br \/>\nb\u00f6l\u00fcmde yer almakta olup, TMK.nun<a href=\"http:\/\/kazanci.com.tr\/gunluk\/tc4721.htm#158\">158<\/a>\/2. f\u0131kras\u0131nda;<br \/>\n&#8220;E\u015fler aras\u0131ndaki mal rejiminin tasfiyesi, tazminat, nafaka ve soyad\u0131<br \/>\nhakk\u0131nda bo\u015fanmaya ili\u015fkin h\u00fck\u00fcmler uygulan\u0131r&#8221;, Mal Rejiminin Tasfiyesi<br \/>\nba\u015fl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131yan 179. maddesinde de, &#8220;mal rejiminin tasfiyesinde e\u015flerin<br \/>\nba\u011fl\u0131 oldu\u011fu rejime ili\u015fkin h\u00fck\u00fcmler uygulan\u0131r&#8221; denilmektedir. O taktirde<br \/>\nbu maddelerin yer al\u0131\u015f bi\u00e7imine hangi gerek\u00e7e g\u00f6sterilmelidir. Buna benzer bir<br \/>\n\u00e7ok h\u00fck\u00fcm bulmak m\u00fcmk\u00fcnd\u00fcr. O halde bu gerek\u00e7e tek ba\u015f\u0131na on y\u0131ll\u0131k<br \/>\nzamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131n\u0131n uygulanmas\u0131n\u0131n gerek\u00e7esi olamaz. Ancak, tali bir gerek\u00e7e olarak<br \/>\nde\u011ferlendirilebilir. Bundan ayr\u0131, istek sahibi i\u00e7in \u00e7ok zorunlu ve ya\u015famsal bir<br \/>\nde\u011fer ta\u015f\u0131yan, ayn\u0131 zamanda bo\u015fanman\u0131n fer&#8217;i niteli\u011finde olan nafaka, maddi ve<br \/>\nmanevi tazminat davalar\u0131 ve benzerleri bak\u0131m\u0131ndan daha k\u0131sa s\u00fcre olan bir<br \/>\ny\u0131ll\u0131k, mal rejimi bak\u0131m\u0131ndan ise olduk\u00e7a uzun bir s\u00fcre say\u0131lan on y\u0131ll\u0131k<br \/>\nzamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131n\u0131n kabul\u00fcn\u00fcn bir \u00e7eli\u015fki olu\u015fturaca\u011f\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131kt\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p>Yarg\u0131tay ve Daire uygulamas\u0131 gere\u011fince uygulanmas\u0131 gereken zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131<br \/>\ns\u00fcresi bo\u015fanma h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fcn kesinle\u015fti\u011fi tarihten itibaren ba\u015flar. Bug\u00fcnk\u00fc<br \/>\nko\u015fullarda bir bo\u015fanma davas\u0131n\u0131n temyiz s\u00fcreci de dahil en az 4-6 y\u0131l s\u00fcrd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc<br \/>\nbilinmektedir. Kesinle\u015fmeden itibaren on y\u0131ll\u0131k s\u00fcrenin son y\u0131l\u0131 ya da g\u00fcn\u00fcnde<br \/>\nmal rejimine ili\u015fkin davan\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 da g\u00f6z\u00f6n\u00fcnde tutuldu\u011funda sosyal<br \/>\nproblemin asgari 15-20 y\u0131la ta\u015f\u0131naca\u011f\u0131 da bir ger\u00e7ektir. Bir y\u0131ll\u0131k zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131<br \/>\ns\u00fcresinin \u00e7ok k\u0131sa oldu\u011fu ancak, on y\u0131ll\u0131k zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 s\u00fcresinin ise \u00e7ok uzun<br \/>\noldu\u011fu ve sosyal problemi uzun s\u00fcre ayakta tuttu\u011fu ve ba\u015fka sosyal problemlere<br \/>\nde yol a\u00e7t\u0131\u011f\u0131 ya da a\u00e7aca\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6zard\u0131 edilemez.<\/p>\n<p>Mal rejimine ili\u015fkin zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 konusunda doktrinde de tam bir g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f<br \/>\nbirli\u011fi bulunmamaktad\u0131r. \u00c7o\u011funluk g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fc benimseyenler; farkl\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131lardan<br \/>\nolay\u0131 de\u011ferlendirmekle birlikte on y\u0131ll\u0131k zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131n\u0131n uygulanaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131<br \/>\nsavunmaktad\u0131rlar. Az\u0131nl\u0131k ise; olayda bir y\u0131ll\u0131k zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131n\u0131n uygulanmas\u0131<br \/>\ngerekti\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrmekteler. Yani TMK.nun<a href=\"http:\/\/kazanci.com.tr\/gunluk\/tc4721.htm#178\">178<\/a>. maddesinin uygulama<br \/>\nolana\u011f\u0131n\u0131n bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ileri s\u00fcrenler iki gerek\u00e7eye dayanmaktad\u0131rlar.<br \/>\nBirincisi s\u00f6z\u00fc edilen madde TMK.nun mal rejimleri b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcnde de\u011fil, kanunun<br \/>\nsistemati\u011fi a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan TMK.nun bo\u015fanma k\u0131sm\u0131nda yer almaktad\u0131r. \u0130kincisi ise,<br \/>\nTMK&#8217;nun<a href=\"http:\/\/kazanci.com.tr\/gunluk\/tc4721.htm#178\">178<\/a>. maddesi bo\u015fanman\u0131n<br \/>\neki niteli\u011finde bulunan nafaka, maddi ve manevi tazminatlarla ilgili olup<br \/>\nbunlar hakk\u0131nda uygulan\u0131r. Mal rejimine ili\u015fkin davalar ise bo\u015fanman\u0131n eki (<br \/>\nfer&#8217;i ) niteli\u011finde davalar olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 s\u00f6ylemekteler. Konunun \u00e7ok tart\u0131\u015fmal\u0131<br \/>\noldu\u011fu ve hen\u00fcz bir birlikteli\u011fin gerek doktrinde ve gerekse uygulamada<br \/>\nsa\u011flanamad\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fclmektedir. Taraflar aras\u0131nda g\u00f6r\u00fclen bo\u015fanma davas\u0131n\u0131n<br \/>\nkesinle\u015fti\u011fi 13.10.2008 tarihinden \u0131slah dilek\u00e7esinin tarihi olan 11.10.2011<br \/>\ntarihine kadar TMK.nun<a href=\"http:\/\/kazanci.com.tr\/gunluk\/tc4721.htm#178\">178<\/a>. maddesinde<br \/>\nd\u00fczenlenen 1 y\u0131ll\u0131k zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 s\u00fcresi gemi\u015f bulundu\u011funa ve daval\u0131 S. vekili<br \/>\n\u0131slah dilek\u00e7esi ile talep edilen kat\u0131lma alaca\u011f\u0131 miktar\u0131 bak\u0131m\u0131ndan s\u00fcresi<br \/>\ni\u00e7erisinde zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 definde bulundu\u011funa g\u00f6re, davac\u0131 E.&#8217;n\u0131n dava konusu<br \/>\netti\u011fi mal varl\u0131\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin kat\u0131lma alaca\u011f\u0131 miktar\u0131 zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131na u\u011frad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan<br \/>\nmahkemece 148.700 TL kat\u0131lma alaca\u011f\u0131 bak\u0131m\u0131ndan davan\u0131n reddine karar verilmesi<br \/>\ngerekirken bu k\u0131s\u0131m bak\u0131m\u0131ndan da yaz\u0131l\u0131 gerek\u00e7eyle davan\u0131n kabul\u00fcne karar<br \/>\nverilmi\u015f olmas\u0131 do\u011fru olmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Daval\u0131-birle\u015fcn dosyan\u0131n davac\u0131s\u0131 S.<br \/>\nvekilinin temyiz itirazlar\u0131 aleyhine h\u00fckmedilen kat\u0131lma alaca\u011f\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan<br \/>\nyerindedir&#8230; ),<\/p>\n<p>Gerek\u00e7esiyle bozularak dosya yerine geri \u00e7evrilmekle yeniden yap\u0131lan<br \/>\nyarg\u0131lama sonunda; mahkemece \u00f6nceki kararda direnilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p><strong>KARAR :<\/strong>Hukuk Genel Kurulunca<br \/>\nincelenerek direnme karar\u0131n\u0131n s\u00fcresinde temyiz edildi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131ktan ve<br \/>\ndosyadaki k\u00e2\u011f\u0131tlar okunduktan sonra gere\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcld\u00fc:<\/p>\n<p>Dava; katk\u0131 pay\u0131 ve kat\u0131lma alaca\u011f\u0131 istemine ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n<p>Mahkemenin, davan\u0131n kabul\u00fcne dair verdi\u011fi karar, taraf vekillerinin temyizi<br \/>\n\u00fczerine, \u00d6zel Daire&#8217;ce yukar\u0131da yaz\u0131l\u0131 gerek\u00e7eyle kat\u0131lma alaca\u011f\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnden<br \/>\nk\u0131smen bozulmu\u015f; Yerel Mahkemece, &#8220;kat\u0131lma alaca\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin davan\u0131n<br \/>\nBor\u00e7lar Kanununun 125. maddesinde \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen on ( 10 ) y\u0131ll\u0131k zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131na tabi<br \/>\noldu\u011fu ve \u0131slah tarihi itibariyle zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 s\u00fcresinin dolmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gibi, esasen<br \/>\nbu t\u00fcr davalar\u0131n belirsiz alacak davalar\u0131 oldu\u011fu&#8221; gerek\u00e7esiyle direnme<br \/>\nkarar\u0131 verilmi\u015ftir. H\u00fckm\u00fc temyize, daval\u0131-davac\u0131 vekili getirmektedir.<\/p>\n<p>Davaya konu edilen, Sar\u0131yer Zekeriyak\u00f6y 1431 parselde 7 nolu dubleks<br \/>\nmeskenin daval\u0131-davac\u0131 koca ad\u0131na kooperatife \u00fcyelik suretiyle edinildi\u011fi<br \/>\n1.1.2002 tarihinden, kooperatif hissesinin elden \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 26.7.2005 tarihine<br \/>\nkadar \u00f6demelerin devam etti\u011fi taraflar aras\u0131nda uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k konusu de\u011fildir.<\/p>\n<p>Direnme yoluyla Hukuk Genel Kurulu&#8217;nun \u00f6n\u00fcne gelen uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k; 4721 Say\u0131l\u0131<br \/>\nT\u00fcrk Medeni Kanunu&#8217;nun y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnden sonra edinilen mallar konusunda, evlilik<br \/>\nbirli\u011finin bo\u015fanma ile sonu\u00e7lanmas\u0131 halinde, e\u015fler aras\u0131nda kat\u0131lma alaca\u011f\u0131na<br \/>\nili\u015fkin davalarda zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 s\u00fcresinin TMK <a href=\"http:\/\/kazanci.com.tr\/gunluk\/tc4721.htm#178\">178<\/a>. maddesi uyar\u0131nca<br \/>\nbir y\u0131l m\u0131, yoksa ayn\u0131 Kanunun 5. maddesi yollamas\u0131 ile T\u00fcrk Bor\u00e7lar Kanunu<br \/>\n146. maddesi ( eBK m. 125 ) uyar\u0131nca on y\u0131l m\u0131 oldu\u011fu; var\u0131lacak sonuca g\u00f6re<br \/>\n\u0131slah edilen k\u0131sm\u0131n zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131na u\u011fray\u0131p u\u011framad\u0131\u011f\u0131 noktas\u0131nda toplanmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p>Mahkeme ilk karar gerek\u00e7esinde; zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 savunmas\u0131n\u0131 ret ederken<br \/>\nuygulanacak zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 s\u00fcresi tart\u0131\u015fmas\u0131 yan\u0131nda, kat\u0131lma alaca\u011f\u0131 davalar\u0131n\u0131n<br \/>\nesasen &#8220;belirsiz alacak&#8221; davalar\u0131 oldu\u011funu ve zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 savunmas\u0131n\u0131n<br \/>\nbu nedenle de kabul edilmedi\u011fini belirtmi\u015f ve \u00f6zel Dairecc bu hususun<br \/>\ntart\u0131\u015f\u0131lmam\u0131\u015f, uygulanacak zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 h\u00fckm\u00fc ( TMK m. <a href=\"http:\/\/kazanci.com.tr\/gunluk\/tc4721.htm#178\">178<\/a> ) y\u00f6n\u00fcyle mesele ele<br \/>\nal\u0131nm\u0131\u015f ve salt bu nedene hasren bozma yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f olmas\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda, Yerel<br \/>\nMahkeme&#8217;nin terditli olarak; gerek uygulanacak zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 s\u00fcresi itibariyle,<br \/>\ngerekse de davan\u0131n bir belirsiz alacak davas\u0131 oldu\u011fundan bahisle direnmesinin<br \/>\n&#8220;yeni h\u00fck\u00fcm&#8221; niteli\u011finde olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u00f6nsorun olarak tart\u0131\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015f ve<br \/>\noy\u00e7oklu\u011fu ile \u00f6nsorun olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 kabul edilerek i\u015fin esas\u0131n\u0131n incelenmesine<br \/>\nge\u00e7ilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p>\u0130\u015fin esas\u0131n\u0131n incelemesinde; uyu\u015fmazl\u0131\u011fa konu ta\u015f\u0131nmaz y\u00f6n\u00fcnden uygulanacak<br \/>\nmal rejiminin niteli\u011fi Yerel Mahkeme ve \u00d6zel Daire aras\u0131nda \u00e7eki\u015fmeli de\u011fildir.<br \/>\n\u00c7eki\u015fme; e\u015fler aras\u0131nda edinilmi\u015f mallara kat\u0131lma rejiminin ge\u00e7erli oldu\u011fu<br \/>\nd\u00f6nemde edinilen mala ili\u015fkin kat\u0131lma alaca\u011f\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnden uygulanacak zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131<br \/>\ns\u00fcresi konusundad\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p>Taraflar aras\u0131nda bir s\u00f6zle\u015fme bulunmamas\u0131 nedeniyle, Kanuna g\u00f6re<br \/>\nbelirlenecek olan; Kanun&#8217;daki d\u00fczenleme \u015fekliyle &#8220;art\u0131k de\u011fere<br \/>\nkat\u0131lma&#8221; alaca\u011f\u0131 olarak ifade edilen ve uygulama ile \u00f6\u011fretide<br \/>\n&#8220;kat\u0131lma alaca\u011f\u0131&#8221; olarak adland\u0131r\u0131lan e\u015fler aras\u0131ndaki bu alacak<br \/>\n01.01.2002 tarihinde y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe giren 4721 say\u0131l\u0131 T\u00fcrk Medeni Kanunu ile kabul<br \/>\nedilen &#8220;edinilmi\u015f mallara kat\u0131lma&#8221; rejimine ili\u015fkin bir kavram olup,<br \/>\nTMK&#8217;n\u0131n<a href=\"http:\/\/kazanci.com.tr\/gunluk\/tc4721.htm#231\">231<\/a> maddelerinde<br \/>\nd\u00fczenlenmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p>Alaca\u011f\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131klanan bu niteli\u011fine g\u00f6re, Yerel Mahkeme ile \u00d6zel Daire<br \/>\naras\u0131ndaki uyu\u015fmazl\u0131\u011fa d\u00f6n\u00fclecek olursa; 4721 Say\u0131l\u0131 T\u00fcrk Medeni Kanunu&#8217;na<br \/>\nbak\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131nda, yasal mal rejimi olarak kabul edilen edinilmi\u015f mallara kat\u0131lma<br \/>\nrejiminde, kat\u0131lma alaca\u011f\u0131na \u00f6zg\u00fc olarak bir zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 s\u00fcresi \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015ftir<br \/>\n( KILI\u00c7OGLU, Ahmet: &#8220;Kat\u0131lma Alaca\u011f\u0131nda Zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131&#8221;, F\u0131rat \u00d6ztan&#8217;a<br \/>\nArma\u011fan, C. I, Ankara 2010, s. 1289; ACAR, Faruk: Aile Konutu, Mal Rejimleri,<br \/>\nE\u015fin Yasal Miras Pay\u0131, 3.B, Se\u00e7kin Yay\u0131nevi, Anaka 2012, s. 275; SONSUZO\u011eLU,<br \/>\nElif: Medeni Kanun&#8217;da Mal Rejimi D\u00fczenlemeleri ve Vergi Hukukundaki Etkileri,<br \/>\nLegal Yay\u0131nc\u0131l\u0131k, \u0130stanbul 2006, s. 50; \u00d6ZUGUR, Ali \u0130hsan: Mal Rejimleri, 5.<br \/>\nB., Se\u00e7kin Yay\u0131nevi, Ankara 2008, s. 82 ). Bu nedenle edinilmi\u015f mallara kat\u0131lma<br \/>\nrejiminden do\u011fan kat\u0131lma alaca\u011f\u0131na uygulanacak zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 konusu tart\u0131\u015fmalara<br \/>\nneden olmu\u015ftur. Hukuk Genel Kurulundaki g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmeler s\u0131ras\u0131nda az\u0131nl\u0131kta kalan<br \/>\nbir k\u0131s\u0131m \u00fcyeler TMK m. <a href=\"http:\/\/kazanci.com.tr\/gunluk\/tc4721.htm#178\">178<\/a>&#8216;deki zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131<br \/>\ns\u00fcresinin bu dava da uygulanmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fini belirtmi\u015f iseler de bu g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f Kurul<br \/>\n\u00e7o\u011funlu\u011funca kabul edilmemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p>Kat\u0131lma alaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131n niteli\u011fi itibariyle, e\u015fler aras\u0131nda bir alacak oldu\u011fu ve<br \/>\ndolay\u0131s\u0131yla bo\u015fanman\u0131n bir fer&#8217;\u00ee olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ( CEYLAN, Ebru: T\u00fcrk ve \u0130svi\u00e7re<br \/>\nHukukunda Bo\u015fanman\u0131n Hukuki Sonu\u00e7lar\u0131, Galatasaray \u00dcniversitesi Yay\u0131nlar\u0131,<br \/>\n\u0130stanbul 2006; s. 68; KILI\u00c7OGLU, s. 1292 ); &#8220;evlili\u011fin bo\u015fanma sebebiyle<br \/>\nsona ermesinden do\u011fan bir dava&#8221; da olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, kald\u0131 ki edinilmi\u015f mallara<br \/>\nkat\u0131lma rejiminin tasfiyesinin bo\u015fanman\u0131n de\u011fil mal rejiminin sona ermesinin<br \/>\nbir sonucu oldu\u011fu kabul edilmektedir ( DURAL, Mustafa\/\u00d6\u011e\u00dcZ, Tufan\/G\u00dcM\u00dc\u015e, Alper:<br \/>\nT\u00fcrk \u00d6zel Hukuku, C.III, Aile Hukuku, Filiz Kitabevi, istanbul 2005, s. 391 ).<br \/>\nZira bo\u015fanman\u0131n fer&#8217;ileri; bo\u015fanma davas\u0131 ile birlikte veya ayr\u0131 olarak a\u00e7\u0131lan<br \/>\nmaddi-manevi tazminat ( TMK m. <a href=\"http:\/\/kazanci.com.tr\/gunluk\/tc4721.htm#174\">174<\/a>\/1-2 ) ve nafaka (<br \/>\nTMK m. <a href=\"http:\/\/kazanci.com.tr\/gunluk\/tc4721.htm#175\">175<\/a> ) gibi hususlard\u0131r.<br \/>\nBelirtmek gerekir ki; TMK m. <a href=\"http:\/\/kazanci.com.tr\/gunluk\/tc4721.htm#178\">178<\/a>&#8216;in salt bo\u015fanman\u0131n<br \/>\nfer&#8217;\u00ee niteli\u011findeki tazminat ve nafakay\u0131 kapsad\u0131\u011f\u0131 madde gerek\u00e7esinde a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a<br \/>\nvurgulanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p>Bo\u015fanma olgusu; salt mal rejiminin sona ermesini, dolay\u0131s\u0131yla kat\u0131lma<br \/>\nalaca\u011f\u0131 gibi taleplerin g\u00fcndeme gelmesini sa\u011flayan harici bir olgudur ( ERDEM,<br \/>\nMehmet: \u00d6zel Hukukta Zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131, On \u0130ki Levha Yay\u0131nc\u0131l\u0131k, \u0130stanbul 2010, s.<br \/>\n203;KILI\u00c7O\u011eLU, s. 1291; ACAR, s. 284 ). Ancak ifade etmek gerekir ki; kat\u0131lma<br \/>\nalaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 g\u00fcndeme getiren; e\u015f s\u00f6yleyi\u015fle kat\u0131lma alaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 talep edilebilir<br \/>\nhale getiren tek harici olgu bo\u015fanma de\u011fildir ( TMK. m. <a href=\"http:\/\/kazanci.com.tr\/gunluk\/tc4721.htm#225\">225<\/a> ).<\/p>\n<p>\u00d6\u011fretide, mal rejimlerinden do\u011fan davalar\u0131n bo\u015fanman\u0131n fer&#8217;\u00ee olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 kabul<br \/>\nedilmekle birlikte; mal rejiminin tasfiyesinin aile hukukunun bir par\u00e7as\u0131<br \/>\noldu\u011fu, bu nedenle kat\u0131lma alaca\u011f\u0131 davalar\u0131nda, zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 s\u00fcresinin TMK. m. <a href=\"http:\/\/kazanci.com.tr\/gunluk\/tc4721.htm#178\">178<\/a>&#8216;e g\u00f6re<br \/>\nbelirlenmesinin isabetli olaca\u011f\u0131 da savunulmaktad\u0131r ( ACAR, s. 284; \u00d6ZUGUR, s.<br \/>\n82 ). Bu d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnce tarz\u0131n\u0131n, esasen bir k\u0131yas olmay\u0131p, geni\u015fletici bir yorum<br \/>\noldu\u011fu ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclse de, maddenin Kanun sistemati\u011fi i\u00e7inde bulundu\u011fu yer nazara<br \/>\nal\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda, bu fikir zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131nda k\u0131yas yasa\u011f\u0131na tak\u0131lacakt\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p>4721 Say\u0131l\u0131 T\u00fcrk Medeni Kanunu sistemati\u011fi incelendi\u011finde; 178. maddenin,<br \/>\nKanunun &#8220;\u0130kinci Kitap, Birinci K\u0131s\u0131m, \u0130kinci B\u00f6l\u00fcm-Bo\u015fanma&#8221;<br \/>\nd\u00fczenlemesi i\u00e7inde, &#8220;Bo\u015fanmada tazminat ve nafaka&#8221; kenar ba\u015fl\u0131\u011f\u0131<br \/>\nalt\u0131nda yer ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fcl\u00fcr. Oysa kat\u0131lma alaca\u011f\u0131 TMK, &#8220;\u0130kinci Kitap,<br \/>\nBirinci K\u0131s\u0131m, D\u00f6rd\u00fcnc\u00fc B\u00f6l\u00fcm-E\u015fler Aras\u0131ndaki Mal Rejimi&#8221; d\u00fczenlemesi<br \/>\nkapsam\u0131nda ( TMK m. <a href=\"http:\/\/kazanci.com.tr\/gunluk\/tc4721.htm#231\">231<\/a> vd. ) yer<br \/>\nalmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p>Mal rejiminin &#8220;bo\u015fanma&#8221; d\u0131\u015f\u0131ndaki sebeplerle sona ermesi halinde,<br \/>\nkat\u0131lma alaca\u011f\u0131nda zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 s\u00fcresinin TBK m. <a href=\"http:\/\/kazanci.com.tr\/gunluk\/tc6098.htm#146\">146<\/a> ( eBK m. 125 )<br \/>\nuyar\u0131nca on y\u0131l olaca\u011f\u0131 genel kabul g\u00f6ren bir husustur ( ANIL, Ya\u015far<br \/>\n\u015eahin\/TANER, Yonca: E\u015fler Aras\u0131ndaki Mal Rejimleri, Legal Kitabevi, \u0130stanbul<br \/>\n2011, s. 191-193; DURAL\/\u00d6\u011e\u00dcZ\/G\u00dcM\u00dc\u015e, s. 391 ). \u00d6zel Dairede, yukar\u0131ya metni<br \/>\nal\u0131nan karar\u0131nda belirtti\u011fi \u00fczere, mal rejiminin bo\u015fanma d\u0131\u015f\u0131ndaki hallerde;<br \/>\nyani e\u015flerden birinin \u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fc veya ba\u015fka bir mal rejiminin kabul\u00fcyle sona ermi\u015f<br \/>\nya da ayn\u0131 maddenin ikinci f\u0131kras\u0131 gere\u011fince mahkemece evlili\u011fin iptaline karar<br \/>\nverilmesi hallerinde 4721 say\u0131l\u0131 TMK.nun<a href=\"http:\/\/kazanci.com.tr\/gunluk\/tc4721.htm#5\">5<\/a>. maddesinin<br \/>\nyollamas\u0131yla TBK m. <a href=\"http:\/\/kazanci.com.tr\/gunluk\/tc6098.htm#146\">146<\/a> ( eBK m. 125 )<br \/>\nuyar\u0131nca on ( 10 ) y\u0131ll\u0131k zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 s\u00fcresinin uygulanaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 kabul etmektedir.<\/p>\n<p>Mal rejiminin bo\u015fanma nedeniyle sona ermesi halindeki zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 s\u00fcresini,<br \/>\nsalt TMK. m. <a href=\"http:\/\/kazanci.com.tr\/gunluk\/tc4721.htm#178\">178<\/a>&#8216;deki &#8220;evlili\u011fin<br \/>\nbo\u015fanma sebebiyle sona ermesinden do\u011fan dava haklar\u0131&#8221; ifadesine<br \/>\ndayand\u0131rmak kanun koyucunun amac\u0131na da uygun d\u00fc\u015fmez. Zira, kanun koyucu mal<br \/>\nrejimleri i\u00e7in ayr\u0131 ve \u00f6zel bir zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 s\u00fcresi \u00f6ng\u00f6rmek isteseydi, bunu<br \/>\nayr\u0131ca d\u00fczenler ve salt bo\u015fanma ile s\u0131n\u0131rl\u0131 olarak de\u011fil de mal rejiminin di\u011fer<br \/>\nsona erme halleri ( TMK m. <a href=\"http:\/\/kazanci.com.tr\/gunluk\/tc4721.htm#225\">225<\/a> ) i\u00e7in de \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fcrd\u00fc<br \/>\n( KILI\u00c7OGLU, s. 1292 ). \u015eu halde kat\u0131lma alaca\u011f\u0131nda zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 s\u00fcresinin TMK m.<br \/>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/kazanci.com.tr\/gunluk\/tc4721.htm#178\">178<\/a> uyar\u0131nca<br \/>\nbelirlenmesine imk\u00e2n bulunmamaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p>Bu durumda kat\u0131lma alaca\u011f\u0131nda zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 s\u00fcrelerinin belirlenmesi kat\u0131lma<br \/>\nalaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131n hukuki niteli\u011fine g\u00f6re belirlenecektir. Uygulanacak zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131<br \/>\nbak\u0131m\u0131ndan da, \u00f6ncelikle \u00f6zel hukuktaki zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 s\u00fcreleri \u00fczerinde durmakta<br \/>\nyarar vard\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p>Uygulanmas\u0131 ve dolay\u0131s\u0131yla ele al\u0131nmas\u0131 gereken zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 \u0131skati( d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fc<br \/>\n) zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 olup, \u00f6zel hukuktaki teknik anlam\u0131 ile borcu sona erdirmeyen,<br \/>\nancak kanunda belirlenen s\u00fcrelerin ge\u00e7mesi ile alacakl\u0131n\u0131n alacak ve dava hakk\u0131<br \/>\nkar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda bor\u00e7lunun ge\u00e7en s\u00fcreyi ileri s\u00fcrerek borcu ifadan ka\u00e7\u0131nma hakk\u0131<br \/>\nkazanmas\u0131d\u0131r ( <a href=\"http:\/\/kazanci.com.tr\/gunluk\/hgk-2010-8-231.htm\">HGK. 05.05.2010, E.2010\/8-231<\/a>; K.2010\/255 ). Bu niteli\u011fi ile zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 maddi hukuka ili\u015fkin bir kurum<br \/>\nolsa da; hem esasa, hem de usule ili\u015fkin y\u00f6nleri bulunmaktad\u0131r ( YILMAZ, Ejder:<br \/>\nHukuk Muhakemeleri Kanunu \u015eerhi, Yetkin Yay\u0131nevi, Ankara 2012, s. 867 ).<\/p>\n<p>Bu a\u00e7\u0131klamalar \u0131\u015f\u0131\u011f\u0131nda kat\u0131lma alaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131n niteli\u011fine bakt\u0131\u011f\u0131m\u0131zda; kat\u0131lma<br \/>\nalaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131n kanundan do\u011fan bir ( parasal ) alacak hakk\u0131 oldu\u011fu g\u00f6r\u00fcl\u00fcr (<br \/>\nAKINT\u00dcRK, Turgut\/ATE\u015e KARAMAN, Derya: T\u00fcrk Medeni Hukuku: Aile Hukuku, C. 2,<br \/>\n14. B., Beta Yay\u0131nevi, \u0130stanbul 2012, s. 174; ZEYT\u0130N, Zafer: Edinilmi\u015f Mallara<br \/>\nKat\u0131lma Rejimi ve Tasfiyesi, 2. B, Se\u00e7kin Yay\u0131nevi, Ankara 2008, s. 234; YET\u0130K,<br \/>\nNurten: Bo\u015fanma, Anla\u015fmal\u0131 Bo\u015fanma ve Mal Rejimleri, 3. B, Bilge Yay\u0131nevi,<br \/>\nAnkara 2008, s. 128; KIRMIZI, Mustafa: Edinilmi\u015f Mallara Kat\u0131lma Rejimi ve Aile<br \/>\nKonutu, Yarg\u0131n Hukuk Yay\u0131nlar\u0131, \u0130stanbul 2012, s. 245 ). Bu niteli\u011fi gere\u011fiyle;<br \/>\nkat\u0131lma alaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131n do\u011fumuyla bu alacak art\u0131k temlik edilebilir, haczedilebilir<br \/>\nve rehnedilebilir (GUMU\u015e, Mustafa Alper: Teori ve Uygulamada Evlili\u011fin Genel<br \/>\nH\u00fck\u00fcmleri ve Mal Rejimleri, Vedat Kitap\u00e7\u0131l\u0131k, \u0130stanbul 2008, s. 380 ). Kat\u0131lma<br \/>\nalaca\u011f\u0131 kanundan do\u011fan bir alacak oldu\u011fundan, TMK m. <a href=\"http:\/\/kazanci.com.tr\/gunluk\/tc4721.htm#5\">5<\/a> yollamas\u0131 ile<br \/>\nBor\u00e7lar Kanunu genel h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinin bu alacak bak\u0131m\u0131ndan da uygulanaca\u011f\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131kt\u0131r<br \/>\n( \u015eIPKA, \u015e\u00fckran: &#8220;Edinilmi\u015f Mallara Kat\u0131lma Rejiminde, Tasfiyeyi ve<br \/>\nKat\u0131lma Alaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 Talep Hakk\u0131na \u0130li\u015fkin Zaman a\u015f\u0131m\u0131 S\u00fcreleri&#8221;, Bilge<br \/>\n\u00d6ztan&#8217;a Arma\u011fan, Turhan Kitabevi, Ankara 2008, s. 843 )<\/p>\n<p>01.01.2002 Tarihinde y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe giren 4721 Say\u0131l\u0131 T\u00fcrk Medeni Kanunu&#8217;nda,<br \/>\nyasal mal rejimi olan edinilmi\u015f mallara kat\u0131lma rejiminde, kat\u0131lma alaca\u011f\u0131na<br \/>\nuygulanacak zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 s\u00fcresi konusunda T\u00fcrk Medeni Kanunu&#8217;nda ayr\u0131 bir h\u00fck\u00fcm<br \/>\nbulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na ve niteli\u011fi itibariyle hakk\u0131n bir alacak hakk\u0131 oldu\u011funun a\u00e7\u0131k<br \/>\nolmas\u0131na g\u00f6re, olayda uygulanmas\u0131 gereken h\u00fck\u00fcmler, TMK. m. <a href=\"http:\/\/kazanci.com.tr\/gunluk\/tc4721.htm#5\">5<\/a> yollamas\u0131 ile TBK.<br \/>\nm. 146 ( eBK m. 125 ) uyar\u0131nca belirlenecektir. An\u0131lan h\u00fck\u00fcmde; &#8220;kanunda<br \/>\naksine bir h\u00fck\u00fcm bulunmad\u0131k\u00e7a, her alacak on y\u0131ll\u0131k zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131na tabidir&#8221;<br \/>\n( 6098 Say\u0131l\u0131 TBK. m. 146; eBK. m. 125 ) d\u00fczenlemesi yer almaktad\u0131r. \u015eu halde,<br \/>\nkat\u0131lma alaca\u011f\u0131nda zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 s\u00fcresi TBK m. <a href=\"http:\/\/kazanci.com.tr\/gunluk\/tc6098.htm#146\">146<\/a>( eBK m. 125 )<br \/>\nuyar\u0131nca on ( 10 ) y\u0131l olarak uygulanmal\u0131d\u0131r ( DURAL\/\u00d6\u011e\u00dcZ\/G\u00dcM\u00dc\u015e, s. 391; \u015eIPKA,<br \/>\ns. 846; KILI\u00c7O\u011eLU, s. 1294 ).<\/p>\n<p>Eldeki olayda; taraflar\u0131n 20.9.1990 tarihinde evlendikleri, uyu\u015fmazl\u0131\u011f\u0131n<br \/>\n01.01. 2002 tarihinden sonra edinilen ta\u015f\u0131nmaz y\u00f6n\u00fcnden kat\u0131lma alaca\u011f\u0131na ( TMK<br \/>\nm. <a href=\"http:\/\/kazanci.com.tr\/gunluk\/tc4721.htm#231\">231<\/a> vd. ) ili\u015fkin<br \/>\nbulundu\u011fu, 12.12.2005 tarihinde a\u00e7\u0131lan bo\u015fanma davas\u0131n\u0131n kabulle sonu\u00e7land\u0131\u011f\u0131<br \/>\nve bo\u015fanma h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fcn 13.10.2008 tarihinde kesinle\u015fmi\u015f bulundu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r.<br \/>\nBuna g\u00f6re, \u0131slah tarihi olan 11.10.2011 tarihi itibariyle Kanunda \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen (<br \/>\nTBK m. 146; eBK m. 125 ) on y\u0131ll\u0131k zaman a\u015f\u0131m\u0131 s\u00fcresinin ge\u00e7medi\u011fi kabul<br \/>\nedilmelidir.<\/p>\n<p>\u00d6zel Dairenin; davac\u0131-daval\u0131n\u0131n kat\u0131lma alaca\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin \u0131slah\u0131n TMK m. <a href=\"http:\/\/kazanci.com.tr\/gunluk\/tc4721.htm#178\">178<\/a> uyar\u0131nca bir ( 1 )<br \/>\ny\u0131ll\u0131k zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 s\u00fcresine tabi oldu\u011fu y\u00f6n\u00fcndeki bozma karar\u0131na, yerel mahkemece<br \/>\n&#8220;davan\u0131n on ( 10 ) y\u0131ll\u0131k dava zaman a\u015f\u0131m\u0131 s\u00fcresine tabi oldu\u011fu&#8221;<br \/>\n\u015feklindeki gerek\u00e7e ile direnmesi, yukar\u0131daki a\u00e7\u0131klamalar nedeniyle yerinde olup<br \/>\nonanmal\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p>Ne var ki, \u00d6zel Dairece bozma kapsam\u0131nda kalan i\u015fin esas\u0131na y\u00f6nelik di\u011fer<br \/>\ntemyiz itirazlar\u0131, h\u00fckm\u00fcn zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 s\u00fcresi y\u00f6n\u00fcnden bozulmas\u0131 nedeniyle<br \/>\nincelenmemi\u015f oldu\u011fundan, di\u011fer temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n incelenmesi i\u00e7in dosyan\u0131n<br \/>\n\u00d6zel Daire&#8217;ye g\u00f6nderilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n<p><strong>SONU\u00c7 :<\/strong>Yukar\u0131da a\u00e7\u0131klanan<br \/>\nnedenlerle, direnme uygun bulundu\u011fundan dayal\u0131-davac\u0131 vekilinin di\u011fer temyiz<br \/>\nitirazlar\u0131n\u0131n incelenmesi i\u00e7in dosyan\u0131n 8. HUKUK DA\u0130RES\u0130NE g\u00f6nderilmesine, 6217<br \/>\nsay\u0131l\u0131 Kanunun <a href=\"http:\/\/kazanci.com.tr\/gunluk\/tc6217.htm#30\">30<\/a>. maddesi ile 6100<br \/>\nsay\u0131l\u0131 Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanunu&#8217;na eklenen &#8220;Ge\u00e7ici Madde 3&#8221; atf\u0131yla<br \/>\nuygulanmakta olan 1086 say\u0131l\u0131 Hukuk Usul\u00fc Muhakemeleri Kanunu&#8217;nun <a href=\"http:\/\/kazanci.com.tr\/gunluk\/tc1086.htm#440\">440<\/a>\/1.maddesi uyar\u0131nca<br \/>\ntebli\u011fden itibaren 15 g\u00fcn i\u00e7erisinde karar d\u00fczeltme yolu a\u00e7\u0131k olmak \u00fczere,<br \/>\n17.04.2013 g\u00fcn\u00fcnde oy \u00e7oklu\u011fuyla karar verildi.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>T.C. YARGITAY HUKUK GENEL KURULU 2013\/8-375 2013\/520 17.4.2013 KATILMA ALACA\u011eI ( Kat\u0131lma Alaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131n 10 Y\u0131ll\u0131k Zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 S\u00fcresine Tabi Oldu\u011fu &#8211; Bo\u015fanma H\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fcn Kesinle\u015fme Tarihi de G\u00f6zetildi\u011finde Islah Tarihinde 10 Y\u0131ll\u0131k Zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 S\u00fcresinin Ge\u00e7medi\u011finin Kabul\u00fc Gerekti\u011fi ) ISLAH ZAMANA\u015eIMI ( Taraflar\u0131n 2002 Y\u0131l\u0131ndan \u00d6nce Evlendi\u011fi\/Ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n 2002 Y\u0131l\u0131ndan Sonra Edinildi\u011fi &#8211; Bo\u015fanma H\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fcn Kesinle\u015fme Tarihi de G\u00f6zetildi\u011finde [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"pagelayer_contact_templates":[],"_pagelayer_content":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-235","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-ictihatlar"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.5 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>10 Y\u0131ll\u0131k Zaman A\u015f\u0131m\u0131 - Avukat S\u00fcheyla \u015eahin<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/suheylasahin.av.tr\/office-web\/2020\/05\/26\/10-yillik-zaman-asimi\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"tr_TR\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"10 Y\u0131ll\u0131k Zaman A\u015f\u0131m\u0131 - Avukat S\u00fcheyla \u015eahin\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"T.C. YARGITAY HUKUK GENEL KURULU 2013\/8-375 2013\/520 17.4.2013 KATILMA ALACA\u011eI ( Kat\u0131lma Alaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131n 10 Y\u0131ll\u0131k Zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 S\u00fcresine Tabi Oldu\u011fu &#8211; Bo\u015fanma H\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fcn Kesinle\u015fme Tarihi de G\u00f6zetildi\u011finde Islah Tarihinde 10 Y\u0131ll\u0131k Zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 S\u00fcresinin Ge\u00e7medi\u011finin Kabul\u00fc Gerekti\u011fi ) ISLAH ZAMANA\u015eIMI ( Taraflar\u0131n 2002 Y\u0131l\u0131ndan \u00d6nce Evlendi\u011fi\/Ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n 2002 Y\u0131l\u0131ndan Sonra Edinildi\u011fi &#8211; Bo\u015fanma H\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fcn Kesinle\u015fme Tarihi de G\u00f6zetildi\u011finde [&hellip;]\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/suheylasahin.av.tr\/office-web\/2020\/05\/26\/10-yillik-zaman-asimi\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Avukat S\u00fcheyla \u015eahin\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/suheyla.sahin.927\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2020-05-26T14:56:05+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"mcsahin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@av_suheyla\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@av_suheyla\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Yazan:\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"mcsahin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Tahmini okuma s\u00fcresi\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"29 dakika\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/suheylasahin.av.tr\\\/office-web\\\/2020\\\/05\\\/26\\\/10-yillik-zaman-asimi\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/suheylasahin.av.tr\\\/office-web\\\/2020\\\/05\\\/26\\\/10-yillik-zaman-asimi\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"mcsahin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/suheylasahin.av.tr\\\/office-web\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/defb2e49614e1878857ee190710c3b03\"},\"headline\":\"10 Y\u0131ll\u0131k Zaman A\u015f\u0131m\u0131\",\"datePublished\":\"2020-05-26T14:56:05+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/suheylasahin.av.tr\\\/office-web\\\/2020\\\/05\\\/26\\\/10-yillik-zaman-asimi\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":5924,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/suheylasahin.av.tr\\\/office-web\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"\u0130\u00e7tihatlar\"],\"inLanguage\":\"tr\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/suheylasahin.av.tr\\\/office-web\\\/2020\\\/05\\\/26\\\/10-yillik-zaman-asimi\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/suheylasahin.av.tr\\\/office-web\\\/2020\\\/05\\\/26\\\/10-yillik-zaman-asimi\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/suheylasahin.av.tr\\\/office-web\\\/2020\\\/05\\\/26\\\/10-yillik-zaman-asimi\\\/\",\"name\":\"10 Y\u0131ll\u0131k Zaman A\u015f\u0131m\u0131 - Avukat S\u00fcheyla \u015eahin\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/suheylasahin.av.tr\\\/office-web\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2020-05-26T14:56:05+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/suheylasahin.av.tr\\\/office-web\\\/2020\\\/05\\\/26\\\/10-yillik-zaman-asimi\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"tr\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/suheylasahin.av.tr\\\/office-web\\\/2020\\\/05\\\/26\\\/10-yillik-zaman-asimi\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/suheylasahin.av.tr\\\/office-web\\\/2020\\\/05\\\/26\\\/10-yillik-zaman-asimi\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Ana sayfa\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/suheylasahin.av.tr\\\/office-web\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"10 Y\u0131ll\u0131k Zaman A\u015f\u0131m\u0131\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/suheylasahin.av.tr\\\/office-web\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/suheylasahin.av.tr\\\/office-web\\\/\",\"name\":\"Avukat S\u00fcheyla \u015eahin\",\"description\":\"Avukat S\u00fcheyla \u015eahin\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/suheylasahin.av.tr\\\/office-web\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/suheylasahin.av.tr\\\/office-web\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"tr\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/suheylasahin.av.tr\\\/office-web\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Avukat S\u00fcheyla \u015eahin\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/suheylasahin.av.tr\\\/office-web\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"tr\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/suheylasahin.av.tr\\\/office-web\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/suheylasahin.av.tr\\\/office-web\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2020\\\/05\\\/suheyla-logo-11.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/suheylasahin.av.tr\\\/office-web\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2020\\\/05\\\/suheyla-logo-11.png\",\"width\":221,\"height\":221,\"caption\":\"Avukat S\u00fcheyla \u015eahin\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/suheylasahin.av.tr\\\/office-web\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/suheyla.sahin.927\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/av_suheyla\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.instagram.com\\\/ssssuheyla\\\/\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/suheylasahin.av.tr\\\/office-web\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/defb2e49614e1878857ee190710c3b03\",\"name\":\"mcsahin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"tr\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/7d7fa62c380cf32b692e675d635c538173d32c651339a7e4ed740a3bc1f07d06?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/7d7fa62c380cf32b692e675d635c538173d32c651339a7e4ed740a3bc1f07d06?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/7d7fa62c380cf32b692e675d635c538173d32c651339a7e4ed740a3bc1f07d06?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"mcsahin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"http:\\\/\\\/suheylasahin.av.tr\\\/office-web\"]}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"10 Y\u0131ll\u0131k Zaman A\u015f\u0131m\u0131 - Avukat S\u00fcheyla \u015eahin","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/suheylasahin.av.tr\/office-web\/2020\/05\/26\/10-yillik-zaman-asimi\/","og_locale":"tr_TR","og_type":"article","og_title":"10 Y\u0131ll\u0131k Zaman A\u015f\u0131m\u0131 - Avukat S\u00fcheyla \u015eahin","og_description":"T.C. YARGITAY HUKUK GENEL KURULU 2013\/8-375 2013\/520 17.4.2013 KATILMA ALACA\u011eI ( Kat\u0131lma Alaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131n 10 Y\u0131ll\u0131k Zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 S\u00fcresine Tabi Oldu\u011fu &#8211; Bo\u015fanma H\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fcn Kesinle\u015fme Tarihi de G\u00f6zetildi\u011finde Islah Tarihinde 10 Y\u0131ll\u0131k Zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 S\u00fcresinin Ge\u00e7medi\u011finin Kabul\u00fc Gerekti\u011fi ) ISLAH ZAMANA\u015eIMI ( Taraflar\u0131n 2002 Y\u0131l\u0131ndan \u00d6nce Evlendi\u011fi\/Ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n 2002 Y\u0131l\u0131ndan Sonra Edinildi\u011fi &#8211; Bo\u015fanma H\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fcn Kesinle\u015fme Tarihi de G\u00f6zetildi\u011finde [&hellip;]","og_url":"https:\/\/suheylasahin.av.tr\/office-web\/2020\/05\/26\/10-yillik-zaman-asimi\/","og_site_name":"Avukat S\u00fcheyla \u015eahin","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/suheyla.sahin.927","article_published_time":"2020-05-26T14:56:05+00:00","author":"mcsahin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@av_suheyla","twitter_site":"@av_suheyla","twitter_misc":{"Yazan:":"mcsahin","Tahmini okuma s\u00fcresi":"29 dakika"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/suheylasahin.av.tr\/office-web\/2020\/05\/26\/10-yillik-zaman-asimi\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/suheylasahin.av.tr\/office-web\/2020\/05\/26\/10-yillik-zaman-asimi\/"},"author":{"name":"mcsahin","@id":"https:\/\/suheylasahin.av.tr\/office-web\/#\/schema\/person\/defb2e49614e1878857ee190710c3b03"},"headline":"10 Y\u0131ll\u0131k Zaman A\u015f\u0131m\u0131","datePublished":"2020-05-26T14:56:05+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/suheylasahin.av.tr\/office-web\/2020\/05\/26\/10-yillik-zaman-asimi\/"},"wordCount":5924,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/suheylasahin.av.tr\/office-web\/#organization"},"articleSection":["\u0130\u00e7tihatlar"],"inLanguage":"tr","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/suheylasahin.av.tr\/office-web\/2020\/05\/26\/10-yillik-zaman-asimi\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/suheylasahin.av.tr\/office-web\/2020\/05\/26\/10-yillik-zaman-asimi\/","url":"https:\/\/suheylasahin.av.tr\/office-web\/2020\/05\/26\/10-yillik-zaman-asimi\/","name":"10 Y\u0131ll\u0131k Zaman A\u015f\u0131m\u0131 - Avukat S\u00fcheyla \u015eahin","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/suheylasahin.av.tr\/office-web\/#website"},"datePublished":"2020-05-26T14:56:05+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/suheylasahin.av.tr\/office-web\/2020\/05\/26\/10-yillik-zaman-asimi\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"tr","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/suheylasahin.av.tr\/office-web\/2020\/05\/26\/10-yillik-zaman-asimi\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/suheylasahin.av.tr\/office-web\/2020\/05\/26\/10-yillik-zaman-asimi\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Ana sayfa","item":"https:\/\/suheylasahin.av.tr\/office-web\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"10 Y\u0131ll\u0131k Zaman A\u015f\u0131m\u0131"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/suheylasahin.av.tr\/office-web\/#website","url":"https:\/\/suheylasahin.av.tr\/office-web\/","name":"Avukat S\u00fcheyla \u015eahin","description":"Avukat S\u00fcheyla \u015eahin","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/suheylasahin.av.tr\/office-web\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/suheylasahin.av.tr\/office-web\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"tr"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/suheylasahin.av.tr\/office-web\/#organization","name":"Avukat S\u00fcheyla \u015eahin","url":"https:\/\/suheylasahin.av.tr\/office-web\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"tr","@id":"https:\/\/suheylasahin.av.tr\/office-web\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/suheylasahin.av.tr\/office-web\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/05\/suheyla-logo-11.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/suheylasahin.av.tr\/office-web\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/05\/suheyla-logo-11.png","width":221,"height":221,"caption":"Avukat S\u00fcheyla \u015eahin"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/suheylasahin.av.tr\/office-web\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/suheyla.sahin.927","https:\/\/x.com\/av_suheyla","https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/ssssuheyla\/"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/suheylasahin.av.tr\/office-web\/#\/schema\/person\/defb2e49614e1878857ee190710c3b03","name":"mcsahin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"tr","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/7d7fa62c380cf32b692e675d635c538173d32c651339a7e4ed740a3bc1f07d06?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/7d7fa62c380cf32b692e675d635c538173d32c651339a7e4ed740a3bc1f07d06?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/7d7fa62c380cf32b692e675d635c538173d32c651339a7e4ed740a3bc1f07d06?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"mcsahin"},"sameAs":["http:\/\/suheylasahin.av.tr\/office-web"]}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/suheylasahin.av.tr\/office-web\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/235","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/suheylasahin.av.tr\/office-web\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/suheylasahin.av.tr\/office-web\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/suheylasahin.av.tr\/office-web\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/suheylasahin.av.tr\/office-web\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=235"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/suheylasahin.av.tr\/office-web\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/235\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/suheylasahin.av.tr\/office-web\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=235"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/suheylasahin.av.tr\/office-web\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=235"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/suheylasahin.av.tr\/office-web\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=235"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}